Monday 27 February 2012

A Portrait of the Artist (SZ) as a Young Man, with apologies to James Joyce for borrowing his most perfect title



At the age of 21, certain that I wanted to become a poet, I went to Europe on a solitary journey—not self-consciously in search of myself or of experience, but as a way to put myself in the moment and remove myself from the cultural context in which I had been raised, and against which I had been fighting for three years. With a little money, inherited from my paternal grandfather, I flew to London and bought a motorcycle and crossed the channel by boat arriving in Oostende, Belgium (since France was closed because of the May 1968 upheaval by students protesting in Paris, who were joined by the entire French labour movement—effectively shutting the country down for a few days).


I had no agenda for my journey, no plans, no proscribed destination but there was a family friend in Vence, near Nice, and it was on my mind to stop there and say hello. The idea of going to Vence then influenced the route I took, heading south through Europe.  From Geneva I followed what was called The Route Napoleon through the mountains to the south of France. I should mention that while I was in Geneva, there because the French borders were closed because of the student revolution, Robert Kennedy was killed in Los Angeles and with his death the last politician I had any respect for was gone. Martin Luther King had been killed earlier in the spring and then Robert Kennedy. I was devastated by his death and sat in chair for a day hardly able to move. It was unusual for me to invest hope for the future in the words of a politician but Kennedy had elicited my trust, more so than his brother John, and when he was shot it seemed like there was no possibility of change or a social upheaval in America, no shift in values, no respect for differences inherent in people. The bigots and the racists and the defenders of the status quo continued to assert themselves on the culture and continued to win. It was a suffocating intellectual environment for someone like myself, and where went America at that time, Canada would surely follow. In terms of narrow-mindedness, and repression of arts and ideas, though, Canada was well ahead of America at that time. I managed to get focused and get up and get out of Geneva after making a few dumb jokes about various conventions and striking out with a gorgeous American woman who was working there for the summer. The ride south was spectacular, one of the most dramatic and physically beautiful routes I have ever travelled and in my ignorance I didn’t quite comprehend the distance I had set out to cover in a day. It was over five hundred miles of climbing mountains and descending the switch back turns and racing through valleys only to come to more mountains. The mountains never ended until I reached the sea. I didn’t know that going in and each time another rose before me after thinking I was in the clear my heart sank as was the light of day sinking and I was in the middle of no where between towns like Gap and Sisteron. Around 7:00 p.m. I reached Vence and riding down the road to the central square I saw the daughter of my family doctor who had asked me to visit her and say hello. She had left Toronto to live with her mother in France and was about 17 at the time finishing her high school education. It was pure coincidence to see her like that on the road and we talked and she told me her mother was away and she was staying with friends and why didn’t I return and stay with them when her mother was back in town. That sounded like a good idea and we said goodbye and I continued on my way to Nice. During the next few weeks I was in Rome, Florence, Pisa, Genoa. In Rome and Florence I saw art and architecture I did not really understand but appreciated some of it. I was more interested in being out on the streets and looking at people than being in churches and museums. One piece I had to see, though, was Michelangelo’s Moses. There had been a framed photograph of the Moses in our cottage as long as I had been going there. It was a gift to my uncle from a friend of his when my uncle graduated from high school. My uncle, who left Toronto and ended up in Paris where he studied medicine and then psychoanalysis, landing eventually in New York to practice as a psychoanalyst, along with his wife, my aunt who he married in France, were the only people in my family with whom I felt comfortable and who seemed to understand and be sympathetic to the vague path I had laid out for myself in life. I spent a great deal of time with them through my teenage years talking and absorbing their cultured way of life. They were intellectuals and they were sensitive and caring people. For that reason I had to track down the Moses and see it and it was a revelation. Carved flawlessly from one piece of stone. How could someone do that? How could someone even conceive of that? I didn’t know anything about art but I knew what I liked. In time I rode back to Vence and Gloria had returned to the villa she shared with her boyfriend Eddy and Nonni, the daughter I had seen on the road.
Gloria was a dynamic, beautiful, red headed woman. She was the first of my parent’s friends to just get up and walk out of the comfortable bourgeoisie life she was living with her husband, the doctor, and her three kids, in Forest Hill Village, an affluent, tree lined neighbourhood in the middle of Toronto. She had been acting in theatre and on TV and wanted to train and pursue a career as an opera singer. Where better to study than Rome. One day she just left her family and her possessions and the city where she was born and headed to Rome. It had been five years since I saw her and when I arrived at the villa she welcomed me warmly and invited me to stay. Eddie was an artist, of Irish Brazilian decent. The villa was not large but it had a beautiful garden and Eddy had created a studio in the garage by removing some of the clay roof tiles and replacing them with glass. I felt at home with them and was reminded of how I felt with my aunt and uncle in New York. Gloria knew everyone and everyone knew her and through her I got to know some of the artists who were working in the region at that time. It was my first exposure to artists as people and I had dinner and drinks and talks with many of them during the ten days I was there. Everyone had a working schedule, a regime, as they called it that was roughly like this: wake early have breakfast and work until around 11:30 then head to the café Regence for a before lunch aperitif and talk with friends then lunch at home and a siesta and then work until 5:00 and return to the café for drinks and talk with friends before having dinner with some friends and most likely after dinner returning to the café to socialize further. It seemed like a perfect way of life and I got into a routine of writing for part of the day when I wasn’t out exploring the region on my motorcycle. Gloria and Eddie introduced me as a poet from Canada and that’s what I was and there were times during the stay when I read new work aloud to people at the café. It was the first time in my life when I felt at home and alive and I wanted that to be my life forever. The people I met were from France, Canada, Poland, Australia, Belgium, Britain, Ireland, Sweden, Hungary and in this galaxy they were all forces, individual planets, spinning around the arts. The arts were the centre of the world there in southern France and there were some beautiful galleries and museums and artists like Man Ray, Chagall, Picasso, living in the region. I was very happy working as poet. It had been a few years since I started writing and had edited a literary magazine at U of T and had published some pieces so felt legitimate and in my milieu. There was nothing else I wanted but there was the question of money and it was running out and I had to live and poetry at that time was not going to suddenly support me so I headed back to London to sell the  motorcycle and wait for  my girlfriend from Toronto with whom I had planned to meet up in early August.

In London I lived in a small room in Hampstead. The room was about seven feet wide by ten feet long and was on the top floor of an old residential hotel. The bathroom was down the hall and the wall separating me and my neighbour was paper thin and she had a boyfriend, an older man, who visited frequently to watch TV and have sex and there was not a sound that emanated from that room that I didn’t hear. I had a friend with a typewriter who lived a few blocks away and during the day I would go to her place and write, using the typewriter while she was at work. We became good friends. London was not the south of France.

When my girlfriend I arrived we did return to Vence and she loved the region as much as I and we stayed with a sculptor I had befriended through Gloria. The region was physically beautiful and the nuances of that beauty, the arid soil, the shape of the trees and the plants, the rolling hills, the rocks and the sky as well as the nature of the architecture, the stucco house with tile roofs, and the age of the buildings in the towns,  were all appealing and made it seem like the most beautiful place in the world. It was essential too that if you were going to be an artist you should be in a beautiful place. Not having a great deal of money was inconsequential in a place of such beauty. What was missing from life that money could buy?

In time I finished school and worked as labourer building swimming pools and my girlfriend who I married worked as an editor and we saved some money and moved to France and were able to stretch the time out from one year to two and our son was born in Cagnes-sur-Mére around the corner from the house Renoir once lived in. I worked with a sculptor on a large project for a few months and learned a great from him about process and patience and thinking in the long term, also about creativity and about living life as a full participant. When the project ended we were living in Tourrettes-sur-Loup a small village about six kilometers from Vence in a building that had once been a donkey barn and was renovated into a two story two and a half room house on the rampart of the village over looking the descending hills of the Alpes Maritimes with a clear view all the way to the Mediterranean Sea. I wrote a novel and a collection of poetry and lived the bohemian life I had sought. Then the money ran out and there was no way to make money in France and we had to return to Toronto. After working as a pool builder again for a season I took a part time job teaching art at a private school in the neighbourhood.

Being with artists and writing had given me the ability to articulate processes and techniques that were often complex. While teaching in the studio I began to try things that I had avoided for years and slowly developed an idea of what it was I wanted to make becoming a visual artist while continuing to write.

Why this story? Had I formulated a mental image of the way I wanted to live, one that was contrary to the way I was brought up. In some way I think this was true and finding myself in France brought a kind of harmony to what I had imagined my life to be and what it had become. Moving back to Canada then and taking a job as a teacher in an old established independent school put me back in a more conventional way of life, especially since I was a parent and responsible for earning a living and taking care of my family. I could handle that and did for many years but the fit was never comfortable, the role in the institution was not a harmonious one, though I never short changed my students and continually pushed to expand the program and the options available to them in studying the visual arts. Having been a terrible student I instinctively understood the challenges to keep people engaged in difficult processes and to help them develop confidence and skill. It was the reality of what I was doing that didn’t fit with the mental image I’d always had of what I had done but could no longer sustain for economic reasons. Ah, money! Does the need for it ever go away?  Returning to The Way Of Zen, yes—in the monastery with the complete surrender of all things material.

No matter how difficult the job became, how irritating the fit with the institution, how taxing sometime the perpetual pressure of working and earning, there was always art and the pleasure to be had in the immersion in the world of visual art. I had no personal agenda, other than ensuring my students worked to the fullness of their individual ability, and was able to take great pleasure in the work they sometimes produced. The days were spent talking to people and helping them solve creative problems and dealing with the results of their efforts, the successes as well as the failures and in offering encouragement to continue and accept the setbacks as well as enthusiastically praising the successes. I was making art as well and teaching the history of Western art and re-visiting that story many times and seeing that it was evolving and not a one track arc permanently etched in stone and determined by the words and thoughts of a few thinkers who had authored all the standard texts. Challenging those notions through exposure and experience opened up the subject and made it a continuous source of excitement.

Saturday 18 February 2012

Just because it is mid-February a shot of the studio on a sunny day in July.

Riffing on Franz Kline

A month after seeing the Ab Ex show in Toronto I was back in the studio in Port Rexton. The room with three or four Klines in the exhibition made a real impression on me. I had always liked Kline and have seen great work of his in San Francisco at SF MOMA and other places but there was something potent about the pieces in the Ab Ex show taking a room of the their own and rubbing up against each other to create some real heat. There was an essence of the idea of what abstract expressionism could be that was contained in that small space. Gestural and spontaneous and bold the Klines came at you and didn't sit politely on the walls as some kind of background decoration or argument for some thesis.

After being at MOMA in New York a few weeks ago I was reminded of how narrowly the argument for modernism has been presented over the years by curators there supported by their own collection and the works that keep appearing over and over again in art history texts like Jansen and Gardiner. Granted the Klines in the Ab Ex show were from MOMA but Kline has never received the attention that Pollack, Rothko, de Kooning, and Newman have received. I think the show went a long way to changing that for me. Especially because I was underwhelmed, I think because of over familiarity, with the late Rothko's and the the Pollacks. There were some early Pollacks that I loved like Stenographic Figures, C1942, but the later drip paintings, at least the ones in that show, that I used to find so muscular, left me cold.

Franz Kline Stopped By... was created as a response to Kline but one using the materials and the approach to image making that I have been practicing in Newfoundland. The following poem is an integral part of the piece and would be on the wall beside it.


Franz Kline stopped
by the studio today
we drank a cup of tea
and listened to Jimi Hendrix
Live at The BBC
what’s with the driftwood
says he,
yiss bye, says I
A little more time in heaven
And you’ll knows why

Tuesday 14 February 2012

A Seal Out Of Water


on the shore
the water was cold and dead calm
and even there
in the ancient sea
his old face gave him a jolt
how did he reach this threshold

what is the upside he asked
struggling to find the words
looking hard into the eyes
of a seal with a belly full of capelin
stranded ten feet up the beach

no hands or feet
just a blown up shape
ten times the size of a rugby ball
with a small head
and deep brown eyes and
little whiskers

would it stay there all night
or find its way back
into the water

a seal out of water
a man in late middle age
there is no upside
no easy way to move

the man walks on his feet
but feels no grace or ease
and may as well be flipping
like an undulating U
dragging his belly down the road

the seal was designed to be efficient in the water
a miracle of buoyancy and speed
like a man of nineteen

Happy Valentines Day

The Virgin Of The Rocks continued

On hearing an artist friend was in London and had spent time at the National Gallery with the two paintings called The Virgin Of The Rocks (see below) I asked her which of the two she preferred, the one in The National Gallery or the one visiting from the Louvre. This was her response;

You posed an interesting question. Since I had a wonderful opportunity to compare I was able to really gather the nuances of the works. The London painting, recently cleaned was very crisp and really showed Leonardo's mastery of light. There was much more evidence of the floral details as well. I also felt that he had rethought the piece and I preferred the tilt of the head of the angel in the London work. It and the glance were much more evocative and sensuous as was the madonna's glance. I could certainly have done without the symbolism of the cross and the halos in the piece which I believe were an afterthought put in after Leonardo. The first painting (Louvre) however still had the freshness of inspiration that evoked the mystery...
 

Tuesday 7 February 2012

Les Desmoiselles D'Avignon, 1907 by Picasso

Still brutal after all these years.
Challenged every notion of what a painting was supposed to be.
Considered the fulcrum on which Modern Art balances.

Agnes Martin Stops Time


Appreciating a work of art is in some ways like an act of meditation. One has to stop before the piece and observe it without the distraction and the noise of the day to day. One has to see the piece fully in order to experience it fully and this requires time, the stopping of time or the ideas of taking the time required for the experience. I am in a museum wandering through the rooms looking at the collection liking this and not particularly liking that, gazing, grazing visually and the experience is pleasurable and then I enter a large room with perhaps ten Agnes Martin paintings all in white with lines marking the picture space, subtle, quiet, understated lines, but lines that impose themselves on the picture space, lines that become the picture itself, and there is something so understated in what she has done, something so unaggressive, something so not calling out for attention. The ten paintings put their hands on my shoulders and make me sit down in the middle of the room and observe and open myself to the experience of what I am seeing. The work is so minimal and so authentic and personal and there is a purity of intent or purpose that makes so many other things I have seen feel like tricks of the trade, feel like product, feel like they were created to garner attention or to seduce. There is none of that with the Martins. They just are and they simply exist as a physical manifestation of the artist’s vision or the artist’s own argument with “what is painting.” And in their purity of purpose make me consider all that I have seen before and all that I will see for the remainder of the day. It is a great experience for me and one rife with surprise because it is really the first time in lets say twenty years of looking that I really got Agnes Martin or was moved by the work she did.

Giotto's Expression of Grief


Giotto was the first artist to actually try to express emotion through the gestures of his figures and the Lamentation Over Christ is one of the saddest pictures ever painted.  As artistic skills were developed and perfected over the course of the Renaissance and into the Baroque the capable artists could all depict grief or sorrow in the expressions on the faces of the characters in their painting as well as in the physical posture and gestures of the these characters. But there  is a difference between depiction and expression and Giotto with his nascent technical skills, struggling to invent the language of representational painting, expressed grief in a most powerful way, creating an image that resonates with emotion. In that picture, one of a number of panels on the wall of the Arena Chapel, Christ has been taken down from the cross on is lying dead on the ground his head cradled tenderly in the hands of his mother Mary, his feet help by Mary Magdelaine and around him some of his disciples and some elders from the community, and all this on a stark and barren landscape with some of the mourners making broad gestures of grief, arms outstretched and body bent over or hand curled and face tucked into the hands, sadness pervades the scene but looking up from the body and the mourners into the blue sky there are a number of angels and the angels are distraught and  their flying has been effected by their grief and their flight paths are on colliding courses and some seem to be falling out of the sky and others are crying wringing their hands and there is this wild, erratic energy in the sky embodied by the angels that reads in an abstract way like wild painterly gestures of raw emotion. This is where the true expression comes in and there is an added dimension to this in its contrast to the solid forms of the figures below who appear to be carved from stone and who could not be moved by the force of a hurricane.